Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1948

Haimerl v. Haimerl

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided September 5, 1948 · PER CURIAM.

61 A.2d 439; 142 N.J. Eq. 740 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

On appeal from a decree of tlie Court of Chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Egan, who filed the following opinion:, “Disinterested witnesses, Julia Walti and Loretta Allison, to some extent supported the complainant’s contention., Mr. Louis Gluch, for the appellants., Mr. Lawrence Wolfberg, for the respondents.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Egan.

For affirmance — Bodine, Donges, Colie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Jacobs, Wells, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 11.

For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Heher, Dill, JJ. 3.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.