Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1948

Caruso v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Caruso v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 29, 1948 · PER CURIAM.
57 A.2d 359; 136 N.J.L. 597; 1948 N.J. LEXIS 276 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

For the appellant, Nathan Rabinowitz ( Ervan F. Kushner , of counsel). For the respondent, McCarter, English Studer ( Conover English , of counsel).

Caruso v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

*601 For affirmance- — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Colie, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.