Fairclough v. Baumgartner
Fairclough v. Baumgartner
84 A.2d 545; 8 N.J. 187
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Fairclough v. Baumgartner
Opinion
ELMER FAIRCLOUGH AND MARTHA FAIRCLOUGH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
HERMAN BAUMGARTNER AND THERESA BAUMGARTNER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
*190 Mr. J. Mortimer Rubenstein argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Milton Schamach, attorney).
Mr. I. Arthur Weiss argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Weiss & Weiss, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Grimshaw.
For affirmance Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and ACKERSON 6.
For reversal None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.