Struyk v. Samuel Braen's Sons
Struyk v. Samuel Braen's Sons
88 A.2d 201; 9 N.J. 294; 1952 N.J. LEXIS 308
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
16 later published cases cite this decision.
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services (N.J. 2010)
- McDowell, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2000)
- Rotter v. Coconino County (Ariz. 1991)
- Thatcher Enterprises v. Cache County Corporation (10th Cir. 1990)
- Harbucks Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1989)
- Dcpp v. D.S.H. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2023)
- Krul v. BD. OF ADJ. OF BAYONNE (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1972)
- State v. Loux (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1962)
- Weber v. Pieretti (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1962)
- Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of Adjustment (N.J. 1957)
- Ardolino v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, BOR., FLORHAM PARK (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1956)
- Sieber v. Laawe (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
- H. Behlen & Bros., Inc. v. Mayor, Etc., Town of Kearny (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1954)
- Lionshead Lake, Inc. v. Township of Wayne (N.J. 1952)
- Cobble Close Farm v. Bd. of Adjustment, Middletown Tp. (N.J. 1952)
- Lappas v. Bd. of Adjustment, Westwood Borough (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1952)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The judgment under review is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge William J. Brennan, Jr., in the court below.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling and Jacobs — 5.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.