Roselle v. Township of Maplewood

Supreme Court of New Jersey February 2, 1953

Roselle v. Township of Maplewood, 11 N.J. 373 (N.J. 1953)

94 A.2d 665; 1953 N.J. LEXIS 291

Brennan, Burling, Dismissal, Jacobs, None, Oliphant, Opposed, Usher, Vanderbilt, Wacheneeld

Opinion of the Court

Vanderbilt, C. J.

(orally). The court is of the opinion that the issues raised are moot, both as to 1952 and 1953.

So that the parties may be under no misapprehension wo would observe, on the merits, that the question raised in ' reference to the lease given to the plaintiff by the Town of Kearny seems to us to be without substance.

The appeal accordingly is dimissed.

For dismissal—Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Usher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan—7. Opposed—None.

Reference

Full Case Name: PIETRO ROSELLE, CRESCENT J. ROSELLE, ARTHUR ROSELLE AND LOUIS ROSELLE, A PARTNERSHIP DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE TRADE NAME OF PETER ROSELLE & SONS, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS v. THE TOWNSHIP OF MAPLEWOOD AND TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MAPLEWOOD
Status: Published