Danek v. Hommer

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Danek v. Hommer, 105 A.2d 677 (N.J. 1954)
15 N.J. 573; 1954 N.J. LEXIS 300
Per Curiam

Danek v. Hommer

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Francis in the court below.

Heher, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling, Jacobs and Brennan — 7.

For reversal — None.

Reference

Full Case Name
John Danek, Plaintiff, v. Julius J. Hommer and Katheryn Hommer, Partners Trading as Hommer Tool Mfg. Co., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. New Jersey Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Company, a Corporation of the State of New Jersey, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant
Cited By
135 cases
Status
Published