Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1955

Toft v. Ketchum

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 20, 1955 · Vanderbilt, Heher, Oliphant, Jacobs, Brennan, Wacheneeld, Burling

114 A.2d 863; 18 N.J. 611; 52 A.L.R. 2d 1208; 1955 N.J. LEXIS 280 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

Weisberg v. Rafael (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1986)
Matter of Evinger (Okla. 1979)
DeLaurentis v. City of New Haven (Conn. 1991)
Grodjesk v. Faghani (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1985)
In re Grand Jury Proceedings (District Court, D. New Jersey 1980)
In re Alswang (Ill. 1978)
Madda v. Reliance Insurance (Ill. App. Ct. 1977)
Devlin v. Greiner (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1977)
Alswang v. Claybon (Ill. App. Ct. 1976)
In re Szczepanik (N.J. 1962)
Mahoney v. Nitroform Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Vanderbilt heretofore filed. Mr. Justice Jacobs votes to affirm for the reasons expressed in his concurring opinion previously filed. Mr. Justice Waehenfeld and Mr. Justice Burling vote to reverse for the reasons expressed in their respective dissenting opinions previously filed. See 18 N. J. 280 (1955).

For affirmance — Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Heher, Oliphant, Jacobs and Brennan — 5. For reversal — Justices Wacheneeld and Burling — 2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.