Mountain Lakes Bd. of Education v. Maas
Mountain Lakes Bd. of Education v. Maas
158 A.2d 330; 31 N.J. 537
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
24 later published cases cite this decision.
- M.A. VS. A.A. (FM-01-0537-18, ATLANTIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2021)
- DCPP VS. J.B. AND C.R., IN THE MATTER OF CA.R. AND C.R., JR. (FN-13-0079-18, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2019)
- Goslin v. State Board of Medicine (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2007)
- EDWARD GRAY APTS./REGION NINE HOUSING CORP. v. Williams (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2002)
- Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1994)
- Sherr v. Northport-East Northport Union Free School District (District Court, E.D. New York 1987)
- Essex Cty. Welfare Div. v. Harris (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1983)
- Davis v. State (Md. 1982)
- State v. Joho (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1980)
- State v. Costagliola (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1976)
- Reiser v. Pension Commission, Passaic Cty. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1976)
- Bonnet v. State (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1976)
- Avard v. Dupuis (District Court, D. New Hampshire 1974)
- Muhlenberg Hospital v. Patterson (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1974)
- Marlin v. McCorkle (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1971)
- Clarke v. Brown (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1968)
- State v. Hobbs (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1966)
- Nj State Afl-Cio v. State Fed. of Dis. Bds. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1966)
- Kolbeck v. Kramer (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1964)
- Ahto v. Weaver (N.J. 1963)
- Sanitary Vendors, Inc. v. Byrne (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1962)
- State v. Congdon (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1962)
- State v. Monteleone (N.J. 1961)
- State v. Graziani (N.J. 1960)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Assuming the appellant’s standing, we nonetheless affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division on the merits for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Goldmann in that court.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintbaub, and Justices Buellng, Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall and Schettino—7.
For reversal—None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.