State v. Graziani
State v. Graziani
158 A.2d 330; 31 N.J. 538; 1960 N.J. LEXIS 251
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
23 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States Ex Rel. Wilson v. Essex County Court (District Court, D. New Jersey 1976)
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JUAN D. SANES (14-05-1705, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2021)
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. NEIT N. FIGUEREO- RODRIGUEZ STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JEAN C. GONZALEZ-ROSARIO (15-05-0613, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2020)
- State v. Kline (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1994)
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1993)
- State v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1988)
- State v. Bennett (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1984)
- State v. Christy Pontiac-GMC, Inc. (Minn. 1984)
- City of Paterson v. Fargo Realty Inc. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1980)
- DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRY v. Union Paving & Constr. Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1979)
- State v. Stefanelli (N.J. 1979)
- State v. Hill (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1978)
- State v. Newell (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1977)
- State v. Lemken (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1974)
- State v. Ferrante (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1970)
- State v. SMITH (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1968)
- State v. Garcia (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1964)
- State v. Segal (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1963)
- State v. Papitsas (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1963)
- State v. Kaiser (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1962)
- State v. Hubbs (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1961)
- State v. Cavanna (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1961)
- Mountain Lakes Bd. of Education v. Maas (N.J. 1960)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Ereund in the court below.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall and Schet- TINO—7.
For reversal—Hone.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.