Callahan v. Dearborn Developments, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Samuel Fulginiti, a Minor by His Guardian, Michael A. Marolla v. Peter Tocco and Margaret M. Tocco (3d Cir. 1972)
- Scheck v. Houdaille Const. Materials, Inc. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1972)
- Jasiczek v. PENN. RR CO. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1966)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
We have examined the record and briefs in this matter and, after considering the proof in the most favorable light to the plaintiffs, have concluded that the judgment should be affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division. We limit the affirmance, however, to a determination that the evidence submitted failed to make out a case within conditions (,a) and (b) of Section 339 of the Restatement, Torts, which is cited in that opinion.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weinteaub, and Justices Bueldstg, Jacobs, Peaüstcis, Peoctoe, Hall and Schet-TI3STO—-7.
For reversal—Hone.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.