Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960

Higgins v. Schneider

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 10, 1960 · Per Curiam

164 A.2d 299; 33 N.J. 299; 1960 N.J. LEXIS 158 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Carter v. University of Medicine & Dentistry (District Court, D. New Jersey 1993)
Davis v. Drackett Products Co. (District Court, S.D. Ohio 1982)
Henry v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc. (District Court, D. New Jersey 1973)
Paju Ex Rel. Paju v. Ricker (N.H. 1970)
Reale v. Tp. of Wayne (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)
Rost v. Bd. of Ed. Fair Lawn (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1974)
Knutsen v. BROWN (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1966)
Friedrichsen v. Niemotka (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1962)
Fernandi v. Strully (N.J. 1961)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below.

Mr. Chief Justice Weintbaub and Mr. Justice Schettino vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Ereund.

For affirmance — Justices Bueling, Jacobs, Ebancis, Pkoctok and Hall — 5.

For reversal — Chief Justice Weinteatjb, and Justice Schettino — 2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.