STATE BY RICHMAN v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
STATE BY RICHMAN v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co., 157 A.2d 505 (N.J. 1960)
31 N.J. 385; 1960 N.J. LEXIS 238
Per Curiam
STATE BY RICHMAN v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.
Opinion
The judgment of the Appellate Division, 56 N. J. Super. 589, is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in its opinion. We add that we cannot find in the record sufficient evidence of specifically identifiable property subject to escheat or custody under the statutes, N. J. S. 2A :37-13 et seq., or N. J. S. 2A :37-29 et seq.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintbaub, and Justices Bubling, Jacobs, Feancis, Peoctoe, Hall and Schettino—7.
For reversal—None.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY GROVER C. RICHMAN, Jr., ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE SPERRY & HUTCHINSON COMPANY, a CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
- Cited By
- 12 cases
- Status
- Published