Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1960

STATE BY RICHMAN v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 25, 1960 · Per Curiam

157 A.2d 505; 31 N.J. 385; 1960 N.J. LEXIS 238 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. O'CONNOR (Pa. 1980)
O'Connor (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1977)
State v. Elsinore Shore Associates (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1991)
In re the November 8, 1996 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1998)
Liptak v. Rite Aid, Inc. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1996)
Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Co. v. McNamara (La. 1990)
North Carolina State Treasurer v. City of Asheville (N.C. Ct. App. 1983)
Rance v. SPERRY AND HUTCHINSON COMPANY (Okla. 1965)
Murdock v. John B. Stetson Co. (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas 1963)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Pee Ctjbiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division, 56 N. J. Super. 589, is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in its opinion. We add that we cannot find in the record sufficient evidence of specifically identifiable property subject to escheat or custody under the statutes, N. J. S. 2A :37-13 et seq., or N. J. S. 2A :37-29 et seq.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintbaub, and Justices Bubling, Jacobs, Feancis, Peoctoe, Hall and Schettino—7.

For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.