Fluoro Electric Corp. v. Smith Transport Ltd.
Fluoro Electric Corp. v. Smith Transport Ltd.
160 A.2d 627; 32 N.J. 277; 1960 N.J. LEXIS 206
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- L & L Oil Service, Inc. v. DIRECTOR, DIV. OF TAX. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2001)
- Walker Rogge v. Chelsea Title & Guar. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1992)
- Miltz v. Borroughs-Shelving, a Div. of Lear Siegler, Inc. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1985)
- 68th St. Apts., Inc. v. Lauricella (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1976)
- Mason v. Niewinski (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1961)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Conford in the court below.
Burling, J., concurring in result.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Hall and Schettino—7.
For reversal—Hone.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.