State v. Phillips

Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Phillips, 167 A.2d 175 (N.J. 1961)
34 N.J. 63
Per Curiam

State v. Phillips

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. 62 N. J. Super. 70 (1960). Moreover, we conclude that the record reveals no substantial state or federal constitutional question which would justify direct appeal to this Court. R. R. 1:2-1; Colacurcio Contracting Corp. v. Weiss, 20 N. J. 258 (1955); Starego v. Soboliski, 11 N. J. 29 (1952).

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hangman—7.

For reversal—Hone.

Reference

Full Case Name
State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Harold Phillips, Defendant-Appellant. in the Matter of the Application of Harold Phillips, Appellant, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published