Reiter v. Max Marx Color & Chemical Co.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Berrios v. United Parcel Service (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1993)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered
We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons given by it. 82 N. J. Super. 334 (App. Div. 1964). To avoid any further misapprehension, we state, with respect to the issue of invitation, that when an owner of premises engages a contractor to perform certain work or repairs thereon, under the law be impliedly invites the employees of the contractor to use such part or parts of the premises as are reasonably necessary for the doing of the work or the making of the repairs.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintkaub, and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and HaueMA® — 7.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.