Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1964

Epstein v. Grand Union Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided September 21, 1964 · Cüriam, Weintraub, Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Sohettino, Haneman, Hall

203 A.2d 257; 43 N.J. 251; 1964 N.J. LEXIS 148 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Tonelli v. Khanna (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1990)
Catalane v. Gilian Instrument (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1994)
Bishop v. Harski (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1983)
Trentacost v. Brussel (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1978)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per CüRIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WeiNTRaub, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, SOHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6. For reversal and remandment for new trial as io damages only — Justice Hall — 1.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.