Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1964

In re Warner

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided September 22, 1964 · Pek, Weintraub, Jaoobs, Franois, Proctor, Hail, Sohettino, Haneman, None

203 A.2d 259; 43 N.J. 254; 1964 N.J. LEXIS 149 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Matter of Goldberg (N.J. 1987)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Pek CuRIAM.

The respondent was convicted of grand theft, a felony, in the Superior Court of California. On appeal the conviction was affirmed. People v. Warner, 134 Cal. App. 2d 829, 286 P. 2d 560 (D. Ct. App. 1955). The Supreme Court of the United States denied his application for a writ of certiorari. Warner v. California, 351 U. S. 912, 76 S. Ct. 701, 100 L. Ed. 1446 (1956). The respondent has offered his resignation from the bar of this State but in the circumstances that offer is unacceptable.

The order of the court is that the name of the respondent be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

For disbarment — Chief Justice WeiNTRAub, and Justices Jaoobs, FraNois, Proctor, Hail, SohettiNo and HaNemaN —7. Opposed — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.