Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1964

Morris v. Postma

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 20, 1964 · Per Curiam

196 A.2d 792; 41 N.J. 354 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

24 later published cases cite this decision.

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Keene (N.H. 1972)
Town Pump, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment (Mont. 1998)
Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. Township Committee of Manalapan (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1994)
Delbonis Sand & Gravel Co. v. Town of Richmond (R.I. 2006)
Scholastic Bus Co. v. Zoning Board of Borough (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1999)
Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of Manalapan (N.J. 1995)
Aronowitz v. Planning Bd. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1992)
Urban Farms, Inc. v. Franklin Lakes (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1981)
Garden State Farms, Inc. v. Bay (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)
JD CONST. v. Bd. of Adjust. Tp. Freehold (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1972)
Tidewater Oil Co. v. Mayor & Council of Carteret (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1964)
Linden Merchants Ass'n v. Linden City Council (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1986)
Timber Properties, Inc. v. Chester Tp. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1984)
KRUVANT BROS. v. Mayor & Council, Tp. of Cedar Grove (N.J. 1980)
TP. OF EWING v. King (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1974)
Sandler v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF SPRINGFIELD TP. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1971)
Meyer v. Warminster Township Zoning Hearing Board (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas 1971)
Harvard Ent., Inc. v. Bd. of Adj. of Tp. of Madison (N.J. 1970)
Ross v. Montgomery County (Md. 1969)
Richmond Corp. v. Board of County Commissioners (Md. 1969)
Hourun v. TWP. COMMITTEE OF UNION (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1968)
Gino's of Maryland, Inc. v. Mayor of Baltimore (Md. 1968)
Bellings v. Denville Tp. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1967)
Meridian Development Co. v. Edison Tp. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1966)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

41 N.J. 354 (1964)196 A.2d 792

HOWARD MORRIS, EDWARD MORRIS AND ROSE MORRIS, PARTNERS, TRADING AS CARICK REALTY CO., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
NICHOLAS W. POSTMA, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
HOWARD MORRIS, EDWARD MORRIS AND ROSE MORRIS, PARTNERS, TRADING AS CARICK REALTY, CO., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIRLAWN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued December 17, 1963.Decided January 20, 1964.

*363 Mr. Howard Stern argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Shavick, Thevos, Stern, Schotz & Steiger, attorneys).

Mr. Morton Hirschklau argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. Floyd V. Amoresano, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN 6.

For reversal Justice HALL 1.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.