Jones v. Bayonne Barrel & Drum Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey October 19, 1964

Jones v. Bayonne Barrel & Drum Co., 43 N.J. 279 (N.J. 1964)

204 A.2d 4; 1964 N.J. LEXIS 152

Affirmance, Cueiam, Francis, Hane, Haul, Jaoobs, Man, None, Prootor, Reversal, Sohettino, Weintraub

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee CueiaM.

This is a workmen’s compensation case which came to us as of right because of a dissent in the Appellate Division. R. R. 1:2-l (b). The Division of Workmen’s Compensation, the county court, and the majority of the Appellate Division found for petitioner, albeit their factual theses were *280not concordant. We are not persuaded to disturb the judgment. It is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance —■ Chief Justice WeiNTRaub, and Justices Jaoobs, FRANCIS, Prootor, Haul, Sohettino and HaNe-MAN — 7. For reversal — None.

Reference

Full Case Name: STAFFORD JONES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT v. BAYONNE BARREL & DRUM CO.
Status: Published