Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1964

Jones v. Bayonne Barrel & Drum Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 19, 1964 · Affirmance, Cueiam, Francis, Hane, Haul, Jaoobs, Man, None, Prootor, Reversal, Sohettino, Weintraub

43 N.J. 279; 204 A.2d 4; 1964 N.J. LEXIS 152

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee CueiaM.

This is a workmen’s compensation case which came to us as of right because of a dissent in the Appellate Division. R. R. 1:2-l (b). The Division of Workmen’s Compensation, the county court, and the majority of the Appellate Division found for petitioner, albeit their factual theses were *280not concordant. We are not persuaded to disturb the judgment. It is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance —■ Chief Justice WeiNTRaub, and Justices Jaoobs, FRANCIS, Prootor, Haul, Sohettino and HaNe-MAN — 7. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.