Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965

Schults v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK

Schults v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 1, 1965 · Weintraub, Jacobs, Francis, Hall, Schettino, Haneman, None
210 A.2d 762; 45 N.J. 2; 1965 N.J. LEXIS 154 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Schults v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK

Opinion

*3 Per Curiam.

We agree with the Appellate Division’s determination (86 N. J. Super. 29 (1964)) that the plaintiffs should first have exhausted their administrative remedies before the Commissioner and State Board of Education. The dismissal of their complaint is:

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 6. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑