Schults v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK

Supreme Court of New Jersey June 1, 1965

Schults v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK, 210 A.2d 762 (N.J. 1965)

45 N.J. 2; 1965 N.J. LEXIS 154

Weintraub, Jacobs, Francis, Hall, Schettino, Haneman, None

Opinion

*3 Per Curiam.

We agree with the Appellate Division’s determination (86 N. J. Super. 29 (1964)) that the plaintiffs should first have exhausted their administrative remedies before the Commissioner and State Board of Education. The dismissal of their complaint is:

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 6. For reversal — None.

Reference

Full Case Name: FRANK SCHULTS, Jr., a MINOR BY FRANK SCHULTS, HIS FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK, BERGEN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
Cited By: 9 cases
Status: Published