Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1967

McGlynn v. Schultz

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided December 4, 1967

235 A.2d 901; 50 N.J. 409 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

50 N.J. 409 (1967)235 A.2d 901

ROGER H. McGLYNN, RECEIVER OF NEPTUNE CENTER ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MORTIMER L. SCHULTZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND DAVID H. JACKSON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS, AND JACK E. PORTIS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

December 4, 1967.

Messrs. Zucker, Lowenstein, Gurny, & Zucker; Messrs. Waldor & Hochberg; Messrs. Pitney, Hardin & Kipp; Mr. Richard L. Amster; and Messrs. Frohling & Gaulkin for the petitioners.

Messrs. Hannoch, Weisman, Stern & Besser and Mr. James J. Shrager for the plaintiff-respondent.

Denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

McGlynn v. Schultz

Opinion

ROGER H. McGLYNN, RECEIVER OF NEPTUNE CENTER ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,v.MORTIMER L. SCHULTZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND DAVID H. JACKSON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS, AND JACK E. PORTIS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

ROGER H. McGLYNN, RECEIVER OF NEPTUNE CENTER ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MORTIMER L. SCHULTZ, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND DAVID H. JACKSON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS, AND JACK E. PORTIS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.