Zentz v. TOOP
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Zentz v. TOOP, 234 A.2d 96 (N.J. 1967)
50 N.J. 250; 1967 N.J. LEXIS 165
Per Curiam
Zentz v. TOOP
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division. Mr. Justice Proctor and Mr. Justice Haneman vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion.
For affirmance ■ — Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Francis and Schettino — 4.
For reversal — Justices Proctor and Haneman — -2.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jack Zentz, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Charles S. Toop and Marion Toop, Husband and Wife, Individually, Jointly and/or D/B/A Lincroft Shopping Center, Defendants-Appellants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Nathan Siegel, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent, and Frank Cordasco, Et Al., Third-Party Defendants
- Cited By
- 15 cases
- Status
- Published