Gilday v. Hauchwit
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Gilday v. Hauchwit, 226 A.2d 834 (N.J. 1967)
48 N.J. 557; 1967 N.J. LEXIS 281
Per Curiam
Gilday v. Hauchwit
Opinion
The judgment as to the defendant Carlo is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Gaulkin and the matter is remanded to the Passaic County Court with directions to enter judgment in favor of said defendant.
For reversal — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 6.
For affirmance — None.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Elsie Gilday, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lucille L. Hauchwit, Defendant, and Alfred G. Hauchwit, Defendant-Respondent, and Peter Carlo, Defendant-Appellant, and the Board of Commissioners, Etc., Defendant
- Cited By
- 6 cases
- Status
- Published