Gilday v. Hauchwit
Gilday v. Hauchwit
226 A.2d 834; 48 N.J. 557; 1967 N.J. LEXIS 281
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Gilday v. Hauchwit
Opinion
The judgment as to the defendant Carlo is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Gaulkin and the matter is remanded to the Passaic County Court with directions to enter judgment in favor of said defendant.
For reversal — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 6.
For affirmance — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.