Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1967

State v. Krempecki

State v. Krempecki
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided July 20, 1967 · Pee
50 N.J. 50; 231 A.2d 811; 1967 N.J. LEXIS 156
State v. Krempecki

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee Curiam.

Defendant was convicted of bookmaking in violation of N. J. 8. BA :112-3. He appealed to the Appellate Division. The sole issue involved is the refusal of the trial court to order the disclosure of the identity of an informer-witness. We certified the appeal before argument in the Appellate Division because two parts of the Appellate Division had reached contrary results upon the same issue in eases decided by us today. State v. Oliver, 50 N. J. 39 (1967), and State v. Bacsko, 50 N. J. 49 (1967).

The judgment of conviction is affirmed for the reasons given in Oliver.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor and Hall — 5.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.