Kaplan v. Haines
Kaplan v. Haines
241 A.2d 235; 51 N.J. 404; 1968 N.J. LEXIS 180
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
37 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Largey v. Rothman (N.J. 1988)
- Jim P. Benge, M.D. and Kelsey-Seybold Medical Group PLLC v. Lauren Williams (Tex. App. 2015)
- Baboghlian v. Swift Elec. Supply (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2007)
- In re Diet Drug Litigation (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2005)
- Brigman v. Wyeth, Inc. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2005)
- Howard v. University of Medicine & Dentistry (N.J. 2002)
- Darwin v. Gooberman (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2001)
- Mayles v. Wentlejewski (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2001)
- Marinelli v. K-Mart Corp. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1999)
- Matthies v. Mastromonaco (N.J. 1999)
- Gallagher v. Burdette-Tomlin Med. Hosp. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1999)
- Hochman v. Karpenski (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1999)
- Matthies v. Mastromonaco (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1998)
- Tindal v. Smith (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1997)
- Whitley-Woodford v. Jones (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1992)
- Febus v. Barot (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1992)
- Behringer Est. v. Princeton Med. Ctr. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1991)
- Navarro v. George Koch & Sons, Inc. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1986)
- Eden v. Conrail (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1980)
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body Corporate (D.C. Cir. 1972)
- Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. v. H. A. Crane & Brother, Inc., Towmotor Corp., and Allied Chemical Corp (3d Cir. 1969)
- MARIE GUERRIER VS. PABLO LLIGUICHUZHCA (L-2644-13, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2019)
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. PHILLIP A. STEED (15-06-0862 AND 16-07-0971, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2019)
- Nicholl v. Reagan (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1986)
- State v. Gelb (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1986)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons given in the majority opinion of Judge Lewis in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weinteatjb and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Hane man—7.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.