Willis v. Security Insurance Group
Cases that cite this one
16 later published cases cite this decision.
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services (N.J. 2010)
- Tyrone A. Huggins v. Mary E. Aquilar (084200) (Hudson County & Statewide) (N.J. 2021)
- Khandelwal v. Zurich Insurance (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2012)
- Selected Risks Ins. Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)
- Engrassia v. Uzcategui (N.J. 2019)
- Rao v. Universal Underwriters, Ins. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1988)
- American Home Assur. Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1983)
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Massey (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1983)
- Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Travelers Ins. Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1979)
- Keystone Ins. Co. v. Atlantic Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1979)
- Beek v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1974)
- McFarland v. Motor Club of Amer. Ins. Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1972)
- Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fd. Bd. v. Clifton (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1971)
- Comorote v. MASSEY (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1970)
- Kish v. Motor Club of America Ins. Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1970)
- Magrine v. SPECTOR (N.J. 1969)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered
The judgments are affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Wick in the Superior Court, Chancery Division, in Willis v. Security Insurance Group, 104 N. J. Super. 410 (Ch. Div. 1968).
Nachtrieb v. Allstate Insurance Company was decided by Judge Wick in an oral opinion within a few days of Willis v. Security Insurance Group. The basic issues are the same and in our view are controlled by the decision announced in Willis. See also, American Motorists Insurance Company v. Kaplan, 209 Va. 53, 161 S. E. 2d 675 (1968).
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Hall and Schettino—5.
For reversal—None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.