Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1969

Rosenthal v. Art Metal, Inc.

Rosenthal v. Art Metal, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 17, 1969 · Per Curiam
250 A.2d 747; 53 N.J. 344 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Rosenthal v. Art Metal, Inc.

Opinion

53 N.J. 344 (1969)
250 A.2d 747

LAWRENCE H. ROSENTHAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND t/a INDUSTRIAL REALTY AND FEIST & FEIST, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
ART METAL, INC., ETC., AND GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, ETC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 5, 1969.
Decided March 17, 1969.

Mr. Edwin H. Stern argued the cause for appellant, Feist & Feist (Messrs. Hellring, Lindeman & Landau, attorneys).

Mr. Joel Sondak argued the cause for appellant Lawrence H. Rosenthal (Messrs. Okin, Okin & Sondak, attorneys; Messrs. Schechner & Targan, of counsel).

Mr. William L. Dill, Jr., argued the cause for respondent General Dynamics Corp. (Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Dill, attorneys; Mr. W. Hunt Dumont, of counsel).

Mr. Richard R. Hellstern argued the cause for respondent Art Metal. Inc. (Messrs. Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin & Kohl, attorneys; Mr. Murry D. Brochin and Mr. Richard R. Hellstern, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 101 N.J. Super. 156.

For affirmance — Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑