Mahler v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Fair Lawn
Mahler v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Fair Lawn
258 A.2d 705; 55 N.J. 1
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Mahler v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Fair Lawn
Opinion
ARTHUR F. MAHLER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN AND THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Major & Major, attorneys).
Mr. Robert L. Garibaldi argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. Floyd V. Amoresano, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN 7.
For reversal NONE.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.