Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1969

Smith v. Township of Livingston

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 15, 1969 · Per Curiam

257 A.2d 698; 54 N.J. 525; 1969 N.J. LEXIS 223 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

29 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

Gumprecht v. City of Coeur D'Alene (Idaho 1983)
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services (N.J. 2010)
St. Paul Citizens for Human Rights v. City Council of St. Paul (Minn. 1979)
San Diego Building Contractors Ass'n v. City Council (Cal. 1974)
Honorable Dana L. Redd v. Vance Bowman (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2013)
City of Ocean City v. Somerville (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2008)
Hudson County Chamber of Commerce v. City of Jersey City (N.J. 1998)
Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co. Inc. v. Borough Point Pleasant (N.J. 1994)
In the Matter of an Initiative Petition for the Adoption of an Ordinance to Amend the Jackson Township Administrative Code (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2014)
Viviani v. Borough of Bogota (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2001)
Sea Girt Restaurant & Tavern Owners Ass'n v. Borough of Sea Girt (District Court, D. New Jersey 1986)
D'Ercole v. MAYOR & COUNCIL, ETC. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1984)
Concerned Citizens of Wildwood Crest v. Pantalone (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1982)
Atlantic City Housing Action Coalition v. Deane (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1981)
Sloan v. Lettieri (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1979)
State Ex Rel. Boyer v. Grady (Neb. 1978)
Lawrence v. Schrof (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1978)
State v. Saunders (N.J. 1977)
In re Certain Petitions for Binding Referendum (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1977)
Maese v. Snowden (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1977)
Girard v. Alverez (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1976)
Union Cty. Park Comm. v. Cty. of Union (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1976)
City of Newark v. Benjamin (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1976)
BOARD OF ED. OF BELVIDERE v. Bosco (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)
Muccio v. Cronin (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Mintz in the Chancery Division, 106 N. J. Super. 444. The stay heretofore granted by the order of September 30, 1969, is vacated.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Erancis, Proctor, Hall, Sohettino and Haneman — 6.

For reversal — Hone.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.