Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1969

State v. Lanish

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 2, 1969 · Per Curiam

253 A.2d 545; 54 N.J. 93; 1969 N.J. LEXIS 461 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

13 later published cases cite this decision.

State of New Jersey v. Gale Sorensen (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2015)
State v. Kent (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2007)
State v. DeLuca (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1986)
State v. Sweeney (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1983)
State v. Dively (N.J. 1983)
State v. Gonzalez (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1982)
State v. Roenicke (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1980)
State v. Tropea (N.J. 1978)
State v. Kraft (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)
State v. Higgins (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)
State v. Ryan (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)
State v. Sheppard (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1973)
Bor. of Roselle v. Santone Const. Co., Inc. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1972)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division, 103 N. J. Super. 441.

For affirmanc e — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman. — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.