The CITY OF EAST ORANGE v. Township of Livingston
Cases that cite this one
56 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Centex Homes of New Jersey, Inc. v. Manalapan Township (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1982)
- City of Newark City of Newark Div. Sewer and Water v. West Milford Township (New Jersey Tax Court 2024)
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services (N.J. 2010)
- Gardner v. New Jersey Pinelands Commission (N.J. 1991)
- Mt. Hope Mining Co. v. Township of Rockaway (New Jersey Tax Court 1986)
- Interstate 78 Office Park, Ltd. v. Tewksbury Township (New Jersey Tax Court 1990)
- Jackson Tp. v. Paolin (New Jersey Tax Court 1981)
- Department of Environmental Protection v. Franklin Tp. (New Jersey Tax Court 1981)
- Atlantic Coast LEH, LLC v. Township of Little Egg Harbor (New Jersey Tax Court 2011)
- Township of Wantage v. Rivlin Corp. (New Jersey Tax Court 2007)
- Brighton v. Rumson Borough (New Jersey Tax Court 2005)
- Board of Education v. Eckert (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2003)
- New Jersey-American Water Co. v. Borough of Jamesburg (New Jersey Tax Court 2003)
- General Motors Corp. v. City of Linden (New Jersey Tax Court 2002)
- Sinopoli v. Borough of Rumson (New Jersey Tax Court 2001)
- MacLeod v. City of Hoboken (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2000)
- Town of Secaucus v. City of Jersey City (New Jersey Tax Court 2000)
- In re Raphael (United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey 1999)
- City of Jersey City v. Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills (New Jersey Tax Court 1997)
- Black Whale, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation (New Jersey Tax Court 1995)
- Exxon Corp. v. Hunt (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1993)
- Cheyenne Corp. v. Township of Byram (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1991)
- State v. Township of Pohatcong (New Jersey Tax Court 1988)
- South Brunswick Township v. Bellemead Development Corp. (New Jersey Tax Court 1987)
- Telepages, Inc. v. Baldwin (New Jersey Tax Court 1987)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered
The City of East Orange sought a declaration that its water reserve property located in defendant municipalities should be assessed as farmland under the Farmland Assessment Act of 1964, L. 1964, c. 48; N. J. S. A. 54:4-23.1 et seq. The trial court found against the City, 102 N. J. Super. 512 (Law Div. 1968), and we certified its appeal before argument in the Appellate Division.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons given by the trial court. We agree also with the trial court that the matter of valuation under the statute dealing with local taxation of water reserve lands, N. J. S. A. 54:4-3.3, is not involved, and we therefore express no view with respect to it.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Welstteaub and Justices Fbancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Haheman — 6.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.