Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1972

In re Perwin

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 7, 1972 · Per Curiam

287 A.2d 3; 60 N.J. 174; 1972 N.J. LEXIS 231 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Matter of Zauber (N.J. 1991)
In re Perwin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2001)
Matter of Surgent (N.J. 1986)
In re Toplitt (N.J. 1973)
In re Zwillman (N.J. 1972)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The respondent was convicted of criminal offenses in connection with a conspiracy to defraud an insurance carrier. The convictions were affirmed by the Appellate Division, State v. Yormark, 117 N. J. Super. 313 (1971), and we have denied certification. 60 N. J. 138 (1972).

The misconduct requires an order of disbarment, and it is so ordered.

At the oral argument respondent stated that he intended promptly to seek further review of the convictions in other tribunals. Should he prevail in those efforts, he may apply to us for reconsideration of this order.

For disbarment—Chief Justice Weintbaub and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Sohettino and Mountain—7.

Opposed—Hone.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.