Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1972

In re Yormark

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 7, 1972 · Per Curiam

287 A.2d 4; 60 N.J. 175; 1972 N.J. LEXIS 232 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Tormo v. Yormark (District Court, D. New Jersey 1975)
Matter of Zauber (N.J. 1991)
Matter of Surgent (N.J. 1986)
United States v. Friedland (District Court, D. New Jersey 1980)
Passanante v. Yormark (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)
In re Toplitt (N.J. 1973)
Travel Agts. Malpractice v. Regal Cul. Soc. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1972)
In re Zwillman (N.J. 1972)
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Wenckus (Me. 1968)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The respondent was convicted of criminal offenses in connection with a conspiracy to defraud an insurance carrier. The convictions were affirmed by the Appellate Division, 117 N. J. Super. 313 (1971), and we have denied certification. 60 N. J. 138 (1972).

The misconduct requires an order of disbarment, and it is so ordered.

We are advised that respondent intends to seek further review of the convictions in other tribunals. Should he prevail in those efforts, he may apply to us for reconsideration of this order.

For disbarment—Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctoe, Hall, Schettino and Mountain—7.

Opposed—Hone.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.