In re Seaman
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In re Hughes (N.J. 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Bespondent stands convicted of misconduct in office, extortion and conspiracy to commit each of these crimes. He has been sentenced to State Prison for a term of 1-3 years and fined $5,000. The precise nature of the criminal activity is set forth in full detail in 114 N. J. Super. 19 (App. Div. 1971).
The circumstances of the case permit of no appropriate discipline short of disbarment.
The order of the Court is that the name of the respondent be stricken from the roll of attorneys.
For disbarment: Chief Justice Weinteaub and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Mountain—7.
Opposed: None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.