The Appellate Division concluded that since there had been no damage during the period of the policy its coverage did not, under its explicit terms, extend to the occurrence set forth in the third party complaint. The particular record before us would not fairly permit any other conclusion and accordingly the Appellate Division’s judgment is:

Affirmed.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Eeanois, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Mountain—7.

For reversal—Hone.