Dwyer v. Skyline Apartments, Inc.
Dwyer v. Skyline Apartments, Inc.
311 A.2d 1; 63 N.J. 577; 1973 N.J. LEXIS 218
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
34 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Begay v. Livingston (N.M. Ct. App. 1981)
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services (N.J. 2010)
- Scully v. Fitzgerald (N.J. 2004)
- Becker v. IRM Corp. (Cal. 1985)
- Brown v. Racquet Club of Bricktown (N.J. 1984)
- Asper v. Haffley (Pa. Super. Ct. 1983)
- George Washington University v. Weintraub (D.C. 1983)
- Livingston v. Begay (N.M. 1982)
- Trentacost v. Brussel (N.J. 1980)
- Old Town Development Company v. Langford (Ind. Ct. App. 1976)
- Lourdes Gonzalez v. 908-910 Washington Street, LLC (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2026)
- Camp v. Ohana Military Communities, LLC (United States District Court for the District of Hawaii 2024)
- Reyes v. Egner (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2009)
- Szeles v. Vena (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1999)
- Ruiz Ex Rel. Ruiz v. Kaprelian (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1999)
- Leibig v. SOMERVILLE SENIOR HOUSING (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1999)
- Leong v. Sears Roebuck and Co. (Haw. 1998)
- Ranalli v. Edro Motel Corp. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1997)
- Peterson v. Superior Court (Cal. 1995)
- Richwind Joint Venture 4 v. Brunson (Md. 1994)
- Anderson v. Sammy Redd & Assoc. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1994)
- State v. Sacco (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1990)
- Armstrong v. Cione (Haw. 1987)
- Diane Jones v. Newark Housing Authority (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2026)
- Marc D. Serra v. Midland Realty Associates, LLC (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2025)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Dwyer v. Skyline Apartments, Inc., reported at 123 N. J. Super. 48. (App. Div. 1973).
For affirmance — Chief Justice Gaeven and Justices Jacobs, Hall, Sullivan, Pashman and Clieeoed — 6.
Opposed — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.