Westchester Fire Insurance v. Continental Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Westchester Fire Insurance v. Continental Insurance, 319 A.2d 732 (N.J. 1974)
65 N.J. 152; 1974 N.J. LEXIS 166
Per Curiam

Westchester Fire Insurance v. Continental Insurance

Opinion

*153 Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Westchester Fire Insurance Co., Richard B. Holcombe, Alice Holcombe and Wilbur S. Holcombe v. The Continental Insurance Companies New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co., Motor Club Fire & Casualty Co., Jackie W. Eisner, etc., and Elmer Richard Potent, Guardian Ad Litem for Richard M. Potent, an infant, Elmer Richard Potent and Charlotte Potent, individually, vs. Jackie W. Eisner, Haltie Eisner, Elmer Eisner, Sr., and Richard B. Holcombe, Sr., etc, 126 N. J. Super.

For reversal — Hone.

For affirmance — Justices Jacobs, Hall, Mountain, Sullivan and Pashman — 5.

Reference

Full Case Name
Westchester Fire Insurance Co., Richard B. Holcombe, Alice Holcombe and Wilbur S. Holcombe, Plaintiffs-Respondents. v. the Continental Insurance Companies, New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co., Defendants-Appellants and Motor Club Fire & Casualty Co., Jackie W. Eisner, Etc., Defendants-Respondents; Elmer Richard Potent, Guardian Ad Litem for Richard M. Potent, an Infant, Elmer Richard Potent and Charlotte Potent, Individually, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Jackie W. Eisner, Hallie Eisner, Elmer Eisner, Sr. and Richard B. Holcombe, Etc., Defendants-Respondents
Cited By
77 cases
Status
Published