Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1974

Westchester Fire Insurance v. Continental Insurance

Westchester Fire Insurance v. Continental Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided May 29, 1974 · Per Curiam
319 A.2d 732; 65 N.J. 152; 1974 N.J. LEXIS 166 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Westchester Fire Insurance v. Continental Insurance

Opinion

*153 Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Westchester Fire Insurance Co., Richard B. Holcombe, Alice Holcombe and Wilbur S. Holcombe v. The Continental Insurance Companies New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co., Motor Club Fire & Casualty Co., Jackie W. Eisner, etc., and Elmer Richard Potent, Guardian Ad Litem for Richard M. Potent, an infant, Elmer Richard Potent and Charlotte Potent, individually, vs. Jackie W. Eisner, Haltie Eisner, Elmer Eisner, Sr., and Richard B. Holcombe, Sr., etc, 126 N. J. Super.

For reversal — Hone.

For affirmance — Justices Jacobs, Hall, Mountain, Sullivan and Pashman — 5.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.