Goldklang v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Goldklang v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
66 N.J. 7; 326 A.2d 688; 1974 N.J. LEXIS 128
Goldklang v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Opinion of the Court
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the majority of the Appellate Division.
Two members of the Court would reverse substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Meanor in his dissent reported at 130 N. J. Super. 307 (1974).
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Jacobs, Sullivan and Pashman and Judge Conford — 5.
For reversal — Justices Hall and Clifford — 2.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.