Boyarin v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority
Boyarin v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority
Opinion of the Court
The Appellate Division, in unreported opinions, affirmed the decisions of the Law Division granting summary judgment in favor of respondent substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division in Creek Ranch, Inc. v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority, 156 N. J. Super. 1 (1976). Appellants filed notices of appeal as of right with this Court by virtue of dissents in the Appellate Division. Upon application of appellants, we granted them leave to rely on the arguments presented to this Court in the Creek Ranch matter.
This Court has filed its opinion in Creek Ranch, Inc. v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority, 75 N. J. 421 (1978) this
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting: I would affirm the judgments of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of that court in Creek Ranch, Inc. v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority, 156 N. J. Super. 1 ,(1976).
For reversal and remandment — Justices Pashman, Clifford, SCHREIBER and HANDLER: — 4.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes — 1.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- PETER BOYARIN AND BERNARD BOYARIN, T/A P & B HOLDING COMPANY v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT HYMAN WEIDENFELD AND BARBARA WEIDENFELD, HIS WIFE v. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published