Transport of New Jersey v. Watler
Cases that cite this one
30 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Ryder/P.I.E. Nationwide, Inc. v. Harbor Bay Corp. (N.J. 1990)
- Christy v. City of Newark (N.J. 1986)
- Mortimer v. Peterkin (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1979)
- Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Thomson (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2006)
- Berger v. First Trenton Indem. Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2001)
- Kenny v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2000)
- Prud. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Monmouth County Mun. (N.J. 1995)
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Monmouth County Municipal Joint Insurance Fund (N.J. 1995)
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. Bang (S.D. 1994)
- Downey v. City of Elizabeth (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1994)
- R.I. Insurers' Insolvency Fund v. R.I. Public Transit, 92-6770 (1994) (Superior Court of Rhode Island 1994)
- R.I. Insurers' Insolvency Fund v. R.I. Pub. Tr. Auth., 92-6770 (1994) (Superior Court of Rhode Island 1994)
- Schechter v. Selective Insurance Co. of America (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1993)
- Rox v. Allstate Ins. Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1991)
- Ellis v. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority (R.I. 1991)
- White v. Howard (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1990)
- Ross v. Transport of New Jersey (N.J. 1989)
- Ross v. Transport of New Jersey (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1987)
- Transport of New Jersey v. Matos (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1985)
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Altman (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1984)
- GREGORY B. FREEMAN v. SHADI M. MAKANASH (L-2463-19, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2022)
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Goglia (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Port Authority of New York v. Ingram (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1989)
- Caldwell v. Kline (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1989)
- Goodwin v. Rutgers Cas. Ins. Co. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1988)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Botter’s opinion, subject to the following comments. Transport of New Jersey (TNJ), as a self-insurer, is not a “qualified person” under N. J. 8. A. 39 :6 — 63 and thus is not entitled to recover from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Eund. The certificate of self-insurance issued to TNJ pursuant to N. J. 8. A. 39:6" — 53 is a “policy” under which TNJ is insured for purposes of N. J. S. A. 39:6-62. Incorporated within this “policy” of self-insurance is the uninsured motorist coverage required of all motor vehicle insurance policies by N. J. S. A. 17:28-l.l. Of. Comorote v. Massey, 110 N. J. Super. 124, 127-128 (Law Div. 1970) (self-insurer must provide the omnibus coverage required of all insurance policies by N. J. 8. A. 39 :6-46 (a)).
We affirm the judgment setting aside the order for payment from the Eund and we affirm the remand to the trial court to permit plaintiff to proceed against Watler. In those proceedings plaintiff shall have leave to prove that there had been a waiver of the sufficiency of service of process on defendant Watler. See B. 4:6-7.
Affirmed, as modified.
For affirmance as modified^-Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clieeord, Sohreiber and Handler — 7.
For reversal — None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.