Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1979

In re Court Reorganization Plan of Hudson County

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 23, 1979 · Per Curiam

396 A.2d 1144; 78 N.J. 498; 1979 N.J. LEXIS 1181 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

12 later published cases cite this decision.

Warren County Bar Ass'n v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Warren (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2006)
State Ex Rel. Frazier v. Meadows (W. Va. 1994)
Mays v. Fifth Court of Appeals (Tex. 1988)
Williams v. State (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2005)
State ex rel. Core v. Merrifield (W. Va. 1998)
Pruett v. State (Miss. 1990)
In re the Negotiation of a Labor Contract for the Employees of the Surrogate (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1989)
In re the 1987 Essex County Judicial Budget Impasse (N.J. 1987)
Camden County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Camden County Clerk (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1983)
In re Court Budget and Court Personnel Essex County (N.J. 1980)
In re the Final Determination of the Local Finance Board (N.J. 1980)
People Ex Rel. Bier v. Scholz (Ill. 1979)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

78 N.J. 498 (1979)396 A.2d 1144

IN THE MATTER OF THE COURT REORGANIZATION PLAN OF HUDSON COUNTY.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued December 12, 1978.Decided January 23, 1979.

Mr. Harold Krieger, Hudson County Counsel, argued the cause for appellants Edward F. Clark, Jr., Hudson County Executive, and Board of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson County (Mr. Krieger, attorney; Mr. Francis X. Hayes, Assistant County Counsel, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Michael R. Cole, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent, the Honorable Thomas S. O'Brien, Assignment Judge of Hudson County (Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Mr. Randy Kopf, Assistant County Counsel, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae County of Passaic (Mr. Martin Verp, Passaic County Counsel, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 161 N.J. Super. 483.

For affirmance Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER 7.

For reversal None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.