Alid, Inc. v. Town of North Bergen
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- DEL PRIORE v. Edison Tp. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2012)
- Del Priore v. Edison Township (New Jersey Superior Court 2012)
- Feldman v. Borough of Ringwood (New Jersey Tax Court 2006)
- Sumo Property Management, L.L.C. v. City of Newark (New Jersey Tax Court 2004)
- General Motors v. City of Linden (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1995)
- Berkeley Arms Apartment Corp. v. City of Hackensack (New Jersey Tax Court 1985)
- L.S. Village, Inc. v. Lawrence Township (New Jersey Superior Court 1985)
- Westerhold, John v. Toms River Twp (New Jersey Tax Court 2024)
- 595 New Brunswick LLC v. City of Perth Amboy. (New Jersey Tax Court 2017)
- Hernandez v. West New York (New Jersey Tax Court 1999)
- FMC Stores Co. v. Boro. of Morris Plains (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1984)
- Exxon Corp. v. Tp. of East Brunswick (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
This matter having come before the Court on appeal from a final judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, and it appearing that this Court, by Order dated July 10, 1981, a copy of which is appended hereto, has determined the manner in which jurisdiction by judges of the Tax Court is to be exercised in actions involving the subject matter of the within appeal, and it further appearing that this Court directed counsel for all parties to address the question of whether the within appeal were moot, and the Court having reviewed the submissions of counsel and having determined that all matters in controversy between the parties as to this appeal have been concluded, and good cause appearing; It is ORDERED that the within appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, 180 NJ.Super. 592 (1981), is dismissed as moot. ORDERED that, pursuant to N.J.Const. (1947), Art. 6, § 2, ¶ 3; Art. 6, § 5, ¶ 4 and Art. 6, § 7, ¶ 2, when relief in lieu of a prerogative writ is sought with respect to any matter then pending in the Tax Court involving a state or local tax, including enforcement of an order or judgment of the Tax Court or county board of taxation, *389 the action shall be transferred to the Superior Court, Law Division, and, for the purpose of having such claim adjudicated, unless good cause to the contrary is shown, the matter shall be heard by a judge of the Tax Court who has been temporarily assigned to the Superior Court, Law Division, by the Chief Justice. FURTHER ORDERED that, if an action in lieu of prerogative writ is brought in the Superior Court, Law Division, relating to any judgment of or any action pending in the Tax Court, the Assignment Judge may assign the matter to a judge of the Tax Court who has been temporarily assigned to the Superior Court, Law Division, by the Chief Justice. FURTHER ORDERED that all filings in the Superior Court, Law Division and the Tax Court in matters covered by this Order shall be docketed and retained in accordance with procedures adopted by the Clerks of the affected courts, subject to the approval of the Administrative Director of the Courts.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.