Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1985

Kalman Floor Co., Inc. v. Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 31, 1985 · Per Curiam

486 A.2d 334; 98 N.J. 266 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Exxon Corp. v. Mack (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1989)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

98 N.J. 266 (1985)486 A.2d 334

KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,
v.
WAKEFERN FOOD CORP., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT. KALMAN FLOOR COMPANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION, JOS. L. MUSCARELLE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, GEORGE H. FRIEDMAN AND CAROL MOFFATT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 7, 1985.Decided January 31, 1985.

*267 Merritt T. Viscardi argued the cause for appellant (Apruzzese & McDermott, Mastro & Murphy, attorneys).

Gerald W. Conway argued the cause for respondent Jos. L. Muscarelle, Inc. (Conway & Reiseman and Shannon Z. Taylor, attorneys).

Robert M. Schwartz argued the cause for respondents American Arbitration Association, George H. Friedman and Carol Moffatt (Amdur & Friedrich, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 196 N.J. Super. 16 (1984).

For affirmance Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN and GARIBALDI 6.

For reversal None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.