Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1985

Williams v. BD. OF EDUC. OF TP. OF DEPTFORD

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 28, 1985 · Per Curiam

486 A.2d 846; 98 N.J. 319; 1985 N.J. LEXIS 2222 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services (N.J. 2010)
Outland v. Monmouth-Ocean Educ. Service Com'n (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1996)
Sa v. Director (New Jersey Tax Court 2012)
Playmates Toys v. Director of Tax. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1998)
Porter v. Elizabeth Bd. of Educ. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1995)
City of Union v. Veals (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1991)
Sanders v. Hunter (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1991)
M.N. v. SPARTA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION (District Court, D. New Jersey 2022)
Stockton v. Board of Education of Trenton (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1986)
State v. Burnett (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1984)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 192 N.J.Super. 31 (1983). The dissenting opinion below did not address the Appellate Division majority’s dictum that the Board of Education should be permitted to recoup moneys paid to appellant because of an erroneous interpretation of N.J.S.A. 18A:30-2.1. That issue is therefore not before us, see R. 2:2-1(a)(2), and we express no view on it.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN and GARIBALDI — 6.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.