State v. Scott

Supreme Court of New Jersey April 9, 1990

State v. Scott, 571 A.2d 1304 (N.J. 1990)

118 N.J. 406; 1990 N.J. LEXIS 35

Clifford

Dissenting Opinion

CLIFFORD, J.,

dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Brody’s opinion, reported at 231 N.J.Super. 258, 555 A.2d 667 (1989).

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 6.

For affirmance — Justice CLIFFORD — 1.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Ashbey’s concurring and dissenting opinion, reported at 231 N.J.Super. at 269, 555 A.2d 667 (1989).

Reference

Full Case Name: State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rory Scott, Defendant-Respondent
Cited By: 14 cases
Status: Published