Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1990

State v. Scott

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided April 9, 1990 · Clifford

571 A.2d 1304; 118 N.J. 406; 1990 N.J. LEXIS 35 (Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)

Dissenting Opinion

CLIFFORD, J.,

dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Brody’s opinion, reported at 231 N.J.Super. 258, 555 A.2d 667 (1989).

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 6.

For affirmance — Justice CLIFFORD — 1.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Ashbey’s concurring and dissenting opinion, reported at 231 N.J.Super. at 269, 555 A.2d 667 (1989).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.