Calabro v. Campbell Soup Co.
Calabro v. Campbell Soup Co.
597 A.2d 83; 126 N.J. 278
(Atlantic Reporter, Second Series)
Calabro v. Campbell Soup Co.
Opinion
SAMUEL J. CALABRO, PETITIONER,
v.
CAMPBELL SOUP CO. (AS INSURED BY NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE CO.), RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,
v.
CAMPBELL SOUP CO. (AS INSURED BY LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY), RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. LEON S. BIALKOWSKI, PETITIONER,
v.
CAMPBELL SOUP CO., (AS INSURED BY NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE CO.), RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,
v.
CAMPBELL SOUP CO. (AS INSURED BY LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY), RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. JAMES MALANDRO, PETITIONER,
v.
CAMPBELL SOUP CO., (AS INSURED BY NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE CO.), RESPONDENT-APPELLANT,
v.
CAMPBELL SOUP CO. (AS INSURED BY LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY), RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Francis T. Guiliano argued the cause for appellant.
William T. Freeman argued the cause for respondent (Freeman, Barton & Huber, attorneys).
Seth K. Shaine submitted a letter in lieu of brief on behalf of petitioners (Molotsky, Rabkin & Schwartz, attorneys).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 244 N.J. Super. 149, 581 A.2d 1318 (1990).
*279 For affirmance Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN 7.
For reversal None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.