State v. Maure

Supreme Court of New Jersey
State v. Maure, 588 A.2d 383 (N.J. 1991)
123 N.J. 457; 1991 N.J. LEXIS 30
Per Curiam

State v. Maure

Opinion

*458 PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime’s opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 240 N.J.Super. 269, 573 A. 2d 186 (1990).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

Opposed — None.

Reference

Full Case Name
State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. David Maure, Defendant-Appellant; State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Raymond Hobbs and Daniel Hobart, Defendants, and Harold Petty, Defendant-Appellant
Cited By
13 cases
Status
Published