Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1992

In re Beck

In re Beck
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided January 30, 1992
126 N.J. 514; 600 A.2d 1210; 1992 N.J. LEXIS 1467

In re Beck

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The reinstatement to the practice of law of BASIL D. BECK, JR., of BRIDGETON having been conditioned on his continued employment with the firm of Yasser, Spitalniek, Bloom & Mazin, as set forth in this Court’s Order of December 13, 1991,

And the association of said BASIL D. BECK, JR., with the firm of Vasser, Spitalniek, Bloom & Mazin having been terminated, effective January 28, 1992,

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BASIL D. BECK, JR., is suspended from the practice of law, effective January 28, 1992, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-12, Joseph W. Veight, III, Esquire, and Theresa Christian-Hunsberger, Esquire, are designated trustees of the practice of said Basil D. Beck, Jr., effective immediately and until further Order of the Court and, in that capacity, shall see to the notification of clients and the distribution of open files as soon as may be practicable.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.